CCAR RESPONSA
Contemporary American Reform Responsa
29. Naming an Uncircumcised
Child
QUESTION: May we name an uncircumcised male child in the
synagogue? In this case the child was not circumcised as the mother has been influenced by
current medical fashion which indicates that circumcision may not be necessary for health
reasons. She fears that circumcision may actually harm the child. (Rabbi R. Raab, Wantagh,
NY)ANSWER: Let me refer you to a rather recent responsum, “The Circumcision of
Infants,” 1982, (American Reform Responsa) which indicates that we consider the
circumcision of male infants an essential and fundamental commandment. Of course those who
are not circumcised would still be considered Jews (San. 44a; David Hoffmann, Melamed
Lehoil Yoreh Deah #79; C.C.A.R. Yearbook, 1890, pp.118 ff; S. B. Freehof,
Reform Jewish Practice, Vol. I, p. 113; S. J. Maslin, Gates of Mitzvah, pp.118 ff).
Current medical fashions are irrelevant for us as we consider circumcision to be a religious rite,
not a health matter. Unless there is a serious medical problem, all male children should be
circumcised on the eighth day. Circumcision remains for us as the sign of the covenant followed
by Judaism since the days of Abraham, our Father. As this boy will be raised as a
Jew, the lack of circumcision will embarrass him throughout life. Furthermore, if the operation is
postponed, it will only become more difficult and painful. We urge that every effort be
made to convince the parents that the boy should be circumcised. Such a youngster should
not be named at a synagogue service and everything should be done to assure his
circumcision.August 1986
If needed, please consult Abbreviations used in CCAR Responsa.