NARR 141-142

CCAR RESPONSA

New American Reform Responsa

90. Asbestos Versus Refugees

QUESTION: The congregation has found some asbestos in its Religious School and discovered that it can be contained at a modest cost, but some parents have demanded its removal which would cost several hundred thousand dollars. At the same time other members of the congregation have petitioned vigorously to use these funds for the rescue and resettlement of Soviet Jews. What would tradition see as more important – the health of our children or the rescue of the Russian Jewish immigrants? (Nora A. Ellenson, Philadelphia PA)ANSWER: Let us begin by looking at the mitzvah of pidyon shivuyin (the redemption of captives). Tradition has considered this a major mitzvah (B B 8a) and Maimonides for example cited a long series of Biblical verses to prove how significant the mitzvah was (Yad Hil Matnot Aniyin 8.10; Shulhan Arukh Yoreh Deah 352). In the Talmudic citation the rabbi permitted funds to be removed from a designated charity to this purpose as it was so important. Even if the funds had been specified only for the rebuilding of the Temple they could be diverted for the sake of redeeming captives. The literature then sadly enough felt it necessary to deal with the order of priority among the captives. Obviously there often were insufficient funds to rescue everyone. The primary importance of this task has been very clearly established by tradition. Now let us look at the matter of health. It is a duty for all Jews to look after their health and for that matter the health of their fellow human beings (Deut 4.9, 15; 22.8; B K 91b; Yad Hil Rotzeah 11.4 ff; Shulhan Arukh Hoshen Mishpat 427; Yoreh Deah 116.5 and Isserles). This means that no product which can cause harm should be used in any way. These citations would certainly apply to the danger of asbestos and, of course, we need to protect both children and adults from problems which may be caused by it. In this instance, however, two solutions are available. Both will assure the safety of the children; one is much more expensive than the other. It would, therefore, be preferable to encapsulate the asbestos and have it checked from time to time rather than spend a very large sum of money on its total removal especially as those funds can be used to rescue Jews from the Soviet Union. This must be done first and the smaller sum of money utilized for the safety of the children.March 1990

If needed, please consult Abbreviations used in CCAR Responsa.