Shabbat candles

CORR 49-53

COMPOSITION AND SIZE OF THE SABBATH CANDLE

QUESTION:

The Chaplaincy Corps (of the military) supplies candles for Sabbath worship in the chapels and also, now, for Sabbath worship in the homes of married military personnel. Does Jewish law require that the candles be of some specific composition (as the Catholics require that their candles be at least fifty-one percent of beeswax)? Furthermore, since the services in the chapels are fairly brief and are over while the candles are still burning, may broken parts of candles be used so that they may go out (of themselves) by the time the services are over? May, also, soldier-families cut up larger candles so that they go out before the family retires? (Asked by Aryeh Lev, Director, Commission on Jewish Chaplaincy.)

ANSWER:

THERE IS A GREAT DEAL of discussion in the legal tradition as to what substances may and may not be used for the Sabbath light. All this is found in the second chapter of Mishnah Sabbath, in the well-known section Bameh Madlikin and in the Talmud, Shabbas, 21a ff. Of course all the discussion in that section on what may or may not be used for wicks, and what may or may not be used for the fuel (which oils, etc.) refers, not to our present-day candles, but to their oil lamps which were (in simplest form) a container of oil of some kind with a wick floating in it.

The motivation of the Catholic Church requiring over fifty-one percent of beeswax in the candles used in Catholic services is a spiritual one. The pure beeswax symbolizes the pure body of Christ (Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 347). But it is clear that the requirements of Jewish law, as given in Mishnah, Talmud and later codes, have no spiritual or symbolic intent at all, but are based on purely practical reasons. For example, most of the materials forbidden to be used as fuel are forbidden because of their evil smell, which might cause a person to leave the room or, at worst, in disgust to extinguish the light of the Sabbath, which is forbidden. The objection to certain wicks is that they are too coarse or too hard to suck up the liquid fuel internally; the fuel just runs up their outer surface and chars it, and thus causes it to throw off sparks. It is evident, then, that the only objection to any material constituting the Sabbath light is a practical one, not a religious one. See the discussion in Talmud, Shabbas, 21a, and in Orah Hayyim 264.

As for our modern-day candle, at first blush it would seem that it should be forbidden entirely because among the materials which the Mishnah and the Talmud forbid is wax, but all the commentators make it clear that it is only the melted wax that is prohibited in the old type of lamp. If it is made, as our candles are, as a cylinder of wax around the wick, it is permissible. See Rashi, at the bottom of Sabbath, p. 20b, and also the Shulchan Aruch, Orah Hayyim 264:7. Hence the matter is clear enough. As long as the candle has not an evil smell, as long as it does not keep on producing sparks, there is no objection to the material used.

Now as to the other question about the danger of the light burning too long after the services are over in the chapel, or after the family has retired in the home. It must be noted that although the extinguishing of light and fire is completely forbidden on the Sabbath, there are some exceptions. One may put the light out if the brightness of the room prevents an invalid from falling asleep {Orah Hayyim 278). Also it is permitted to cover the light if its flame may endanger the building. The Mishnah {Sabbath 16:7) speaks of endangering “the beams of the ceiling.” A cover may be put over the light, no t to extinguish it, but to keep the flame from doing any damage. Of course there must be enough air under the covering for the flame to continue burning ( Orah Hayyim 277:5). So you could cover the light in the chapel or in the home with a porous dome like the dome that we use to keep toast warm, or like a kitchen collander. In other words, you may shield the light to keep it from doing damage, provided you do not extinguish it (cf. Be’er Hetev).

Is it permissible to use smaller candles or parts of candles so that they may burn out before the people leave the chapel or the people at home retire? This question depends on a larger question, namely, whether there is a minimum duration period for the Sabbath lights to burn. There is such a minimum duration period, for example, for the Chanukah lights. The Chanukah lights were originally kindled at the door of the house so that passers-by could see them. Therefore the duration period of the Chanukah lights was fixed in relationship to the street traffic. The Chanukah lights should not be lit before sunset, nor later than the time when pedestrian travel has ceased in the streets (“till the footsteps have ceased in the street”) {Sabbath 21 b, Orah Hayyim 672). After this latter period (i.e., when pedestrian traffic ceases) the proper time is considered past and thereafter secular use may be made of the Chanukah lights. See also Responsa Rashba, # 170.

Is there such a definite time limit set for the Sabbath lights? There is a time set for the beginning of the lighting of the Sabbath lights. It should not be before sunset (Orah Hayyim 261:1). But if one wishes “to add from the profane to the holy,” i.e., to begin his Sabbath observance sooner, the lights may be lit earlier. See Isserles to Orah Hayyim 261:1 and 2; also 263:4. But nowhere in the law does it say, as it does about Chanukah, what the end time limit is. Therefore it may burn an hour or two or three, or all night if that is desired. There is no period at which, as with Chanukah, one can say “its proper time is past.” However, the Kitzur Shulchan Aruch (75:2) says they should burn at least till the meal is over. This is not very long. Therefore it makes little difference how large or how small the candle is.

As for broken parts of candles, there can be no objection to these either. It is, of course, preferable to have a whole loaf of bread for the Motzeh, or a full cup of wine for the Kiddush, but nowhere is any preference expressed for a complete, unbroken candle. After all, the original Sabbath light was just a dish of oil and a wick.

To sum up: Any material, except ill-smelling or inefficient material, may be used in the Sabbath candle. It may be covered to protect it from damaging the chapel after the services are over. There is no objection to using a small or a broken candle, since there is no fixed time limit as to how long the Sabbath light must burn.

RRT 9-10

SYNAGOGUE SABBATH CANDLES PREKINDLED

QUESTION:

If there is some objection to lighting the candles on Friday night in the synagogue because it is already dark, would it be proper to have the candles lit earlier, possibly by a non-Jew (or by a Jew, well before the Sabbath), and then during the service for a woman of the congregation to bless the candles which have already been lit? (Asked by Rabbi Jack Segal, Houston, Texas.)

ANSWER:

I HAVE NEVER written on this situation, and it is a very interesting one because, in a way, there is an analogy to it which might justify this practice.

As you know, all blessings must be given immediately before the action which is blessed takes place. If you make a blessing over bread, the bread must be eaten without delay, etc. Now this creates a problem with the Sabbath lights. By normal practice at the home table, the mother should recite the blessing and then light the lights. But the problem with Sabbath lights is this: Which of the two actions, the reciting of the blessing or the actual kindling of the lights, converts the evening from weekday to Sabbath? It is possible that the reciting of the blessing makes it the Sabbath. In that case, how can the woman light the lights if it is already Sabbath? This would be a profaning of the Sabbath. But should she light the lights first? If it is the lighting of the lights that makes it Sabbath, there would be no violation of the Sabbath in reciting the blessing. However, the rule is that the blessing must come before the action (over l’asioson). How can she solve the dilemma? She lights the lights first, covers her eyes so as not to see the light, recites the blessing, removes her hands from her eyes, and sees the light immediately after the blessing. This explains the custom of the mother covering her eyes and solves the legal problem of how to avoid violating the Sabbath.

If it is the custom now in your synagogue to have the lights lit first, then what can be done is this: The lights could be screened by some nicely embroidered screen, and then, when the woman comes up to bless the lights, the first thing she does is to recite the blessing, and then she can remove the screen so that she and the congregation will see the lights. This would be a fair analogy to what is done at home.

CARR 247-248

CCAR RESPONSA

Contemporary American Reform Responsa

165. May a Non-Jew Light the Shabbat Eve

Candles

QUESTION: May a non-Jew married to a Jew light the

shabbat eve candles? The question has arisen at the time when a son of such a couple is

about to be Bar Mitzvah. Normally the mother of the Bar/Bat Mitzvah

participates in the shabbat eve ceremony by lighting the candles. May she do so

under the circumstances? (Rabbi E. Palnick, Little Rock, AR)ANSWER: Tradition

has little to say on this specifically as the custom of lighting the candles in the synagogue is an

innovation of the Reform movement. It may have been intended as a revival of an ancient

custom of lighting the shabbat candles following the afternoon service in the synagogue

(Sidur Rav Amram, ed., Jerusalem, 1979, p. 61, also Isaac Lamperonti, Pahad

Yitzhaq, Hadlakhah). It came as a recent addition to the late Friday evening service created

by Isaac Mayer Wise. His first congregation was not enthusiastic but did permit him to establish

such a service in 1869 (W. G. Plaut, “The Sabbath in the-Reform Movement,” C.C.A.R.

Yearbook, Vol. 75, p. 177). This service did not contain the ritual of lighting the candles in

the synagogue, nor did the early editions of the Union Prayerbook. It was introduced in

the newly revised edition of 1940 and has become an accepted part of our liturgy. The

lighting of shabbat candles at the erev shabbat service represents a synagogue

version of the mitzvah of lighting shabbat candles at home (M. Shab II, 6).

This was one of the three mitzvot specifically commanded to women (Shulhan

Arukh Orah Hayim 263.3), although both men and women may light the

candles. The non-Jewish spouse’s participation in the Friday evening ritual at home

has evolved naturally. Frequently she does light the shabbat candles and through this

indicates a wish to establish some ties with Judaism at home. Technically, of course, it is

inappropriate for a Christian to recite the traditional benediction as it contains the words asher

qidshanu – “who sanctified us with His commandments,” which indicates an obligation

imposed on Jews. We have, however, taken this act as a positive indication that the home is to

be Jewish. We can not apply the same reasoning to the non-Jewish mother’s

participation in the Friday evening service by reciting the traditional words on the occasion of her

child’s Bar/Bat Mitzvah. This is a public service and non-Jews may not lead in

essential segments of the synagogue service or sections which utilize such phrases as “who has

sanctified us” (“Participation of Non-Jews in a Jewish Public Service,” W. Jacob, American

Reform Responsa, #6). The non-Jewish mother may light the candles and recite a modified

prayer while someone else, perhaps another family member, should recite the traditional

b’rakhah.January 1984

If needed, please consult Abbreviations used in CCAR Responsa.

NARR 91-92

CCAR RESPONSA

New American Reform Responsa

56. Why Kindle Two Lights on Friday Evening?

QUESTION: Why do we kindle two lights on Friday evening? (Aaron Cohen, Louisville KY) ANSWER: The origin of the shabbat lamp goes back to the Mishnah (M Shabbat 2.1). There and in the appropriate sections of the Talmud we see that only one shabbat light was mentioned. The discussions dealt with the nature of the fuel for the single light; whether it could be tallow, or various kinds of oil. Further discussions dealt with moving the lamp as well as extinguishing the light (Shab 20b ff). In none of these places as well as the later Talmudic discussion was a second light for erev shabbat mentioned. The first source of our custom seems to be Jacob ben Asher who wrote that it was customary to kindle a beautifully prepared light and that among some, two lights were kindled reminiscent of the two versions of the shabbat commandment in the Decalogue with the words shamor and zakhor. This custom was limited to the wealthy as the next sentences dealt with individuals who could not afford both shabbat and Hanukkah lights, or who did not have sufficient money for both the light and the wine for qiddush (Agur #358; Tur Orah Hayim 263; Shulhan Arukh Orah Hayim 263). Another minhag which arose during more prosperous times called for kindling lights or candles for every member of the family or for each child in the family (Shulhan Arukh Orah Hayim 263.1 ff). For this reason we find some older shabbat lamps with a large number of arms, five, seven or eight are fairly common (A Kanof Jewish Ritual Art pp 102 ff, S. S. Kayser (ed) Jewish Ceremonial Art pp 74 ff; I Schachar Jewish Tradition in Art pp 206 ff; H. J. Spiller The Cofeld Judaic Museum pp 20ff; Journal of Jewish Art Vols 1-15). We can see that it has become a general custom to have two lights in order to usher in the shabbat. However, one would certainly be acceptable and any larger number presents the continuation of a fine minhag.August 1991

If needed, please consult Abbreviations used in CCAR Responsa.